Gold & Metals Risk: How Importers and Exporters Can Protect Margins in a Volatile Market
- Ronald van Rensburg
- 2 days ago
- 4 min read

1. Introduction – Why Metals Matter Now
Gold and industrial metals have been on a tear over the last 12 months. From August 2024 to July 2025, gold surged from $2,470/oz to over $3,340/oz, while copper traded consistently above $9,000/mt. Platinum, a key South African export, also spiked above $1,300/oz in June 2025. For CFOs and Treasurers, this volatility has been compounded by swings in the USD/ZAR, which averaged between 17.5 and 18.9 during the same period.
The result? Importers faced rising landed costs, while exporters saw earnings fluctuate wildly. For mid-market corporates with tight margins, unmanaged exposure can mean a swing of several percentage points in profitability. This guide explores how to quantify these risks and use exchange-traded futures and options to stabilise results.
2. Understanding Metal Price Risk
Key Exposures
· Importers: Manufacturers in automotive, electronics, and construction that source copper, aluminium, or steel.
· Exporters: Mining houses selling gold and platinum into global markets.
Volatility Snapshot (Aug 2024–Jul 2025)
· Gold (USD): 9.85% annualised vol
· Copper: 12.60% vol
· Platinum: 27.54% vol (most volatile)
· USDZAR: 8.18% vol
· Gold in ZAR: 12.57% vol
Gold vs USDZAR correlation: ρ ≈ –0.54 (monthly log returns, Aug-2024 → Jul-2025, Gold in USD vs USDZAR). This indicates a moderately negative relationship, suggesting that when the rand weakens, gold prices (in USD) often strengthen, amplifying local ZAR-denominated volatility.
Footnote: Correlation estimates are sensitive to data window, frequency, and whether Gold is measured in USD or ZAR terms. Using daily data or a different time horizon will yield different values.
3. Exchange-Traded Hedging Tools – Why Futures and Options Stand Out
Futures
· How they work: Exchange-traded contracts obligating buyer/seller to transact a standard quantity of metal at a future date and price. Marked-to-market daily.
· Strengths: Transparency, liquidity, reduced counterparty risk (clearinghouse guarantees), and standardisation.
· Use case: Importers locking in future input costs or exporters stabilising sales revenue.
· Example: A South African electronics importer buys COMEX copper futures to secure input costs. Gains on futures offset higher spot copper costs.
Options
· How they work: Provide the right, but not obligation, to buy (call) or sell (put) a commodity at a set strike price.
· Strengths: Flexibility, ability to insure against adverse moves while retaining upside. Zero risk of forced early settlement due to exchange clearing.
· Use case: Exporter buying gold put options to protect against falling prices while keeping upside open if gold rallies.
· Example – Collar: Buy put at $2,232, sell call at $2,585. Effective price band created at near-zero cost. In ZAR, this stabilises margins while allowing upside participation.
4. Hedge Effectiveness – IFRS 9 Example
Scenario: Forecast 1,000 oz monthly gold purchases (Feb–Jul 2025) hedged with exchange-traded futures at an 80% ratio.
· Prospective assessment: correlation ≈ -0.80 → within IFRS 9’s 80–125% rule.
· Retrospective dollar-offset ratio: -0.80 → effective.
Disclosure Example:> “The Group designates cash-flow hedge relationships to hedge variability in highly probable forecast purchases of precious metals. Hedge instruments are exchange-traded futures designated at an 80% hedge ratio. Hedge effectiveness is assessed prospectively via critical-terms match and quantitatively via dollar-offset testing. Effective changes are recognised in OCI, with reclassification aligned to profit and loss.”
5. Case Study – Importer of Industrial Metals
Assumptions: Annual copper/aluminium purchases of R50m; base margin 20%. Shock scenario: ZAR weakens 5%, copper rises 10%.
Scenario | Revenue (ZAR) | Cost (ZAR) | Margin % |
No Hedge | 62.5m | 57.8m | 7.6% |
50% Futures Cover | 62.5m | 53.9m | 13.8% |
Result: Exchange-traded futures reduced cost variance and nearly doubled the operating margin, without counterparty credit exposure.
6. Common Challenges & Myths
· “OTC forwards are cheaper” → Not always. Futures often tighter on bid/ask spreads and eliminate credit risk costs.
· “Hedging is speculation” → False. Hedging = disciplined risk transfer.
· “Futures drain liquidity due to margin calls” → In reality, exchange clearing reduces systemic risk; disciplined treasury planning mitigates liquidity needs.
· “Options are too complex” → Basic collars and protective puts are intuitive insurance strategies.
7. Metals Hedging Readiness Checklist
· Do you map exposures by month/quarter?
· Do you assess liquidity impact of futures margining?
· Do you use options for asymmetric risks (e.g., steep downside)?
· Do you run hedge effectiveness back-testing (80–125% rule)?
· Do you maintain IFRS 9 documentation for all hedge designations?
· Do you stress test both price and FX scenarios in tandem?
8. Conclusion – Positioning for Resilience
Volatile metals markets are here to stay. For South African corporates, this volatility can mean the difference between profit and loss. The good news: with a disciplined hedging framework built on transparent, liquid, exchange-traded futures and options, CFOs and Treasurers can stabilise margins, meet IFRS 9 requirements, and avoid the pitfalls of opaque OTC markets.
Book a Risk Clarity Call to benchmark your exposure, test hedge effectiveness, and build a metals risk program tailored to your business or if you need a more sustainable trading environment then open a Tradeview Futures account.
Comments